
One year ago to the day I made a hasty and erroneous decision to ridicule a film that everyone else seemed to see something special in. After some time, numerous (sometimes heated) discussions, and multiple re-watch sessions I have come to the conclusion that I was totally incorrect to judge this film in the manner I originally did. I feel so strongly about this that I have decided to officially go on the record to explain and correct myself. The film that I am referring to is Quentin Tarantino's war epic
Inglourious Basterds.
Sometimes a combination of anticipation, expectations, and first impressions can create a perfect storm of disappointment. In 2009 I wasn't looking forward to a single film more than Basterds. Tarantino has been, and continues to be one of my all time favorite writer/directors. When I heard that he was finally making a WWII film I became giddy at the notion that it would be a cranage filled blood bath of style in the manner that he had previously amped up the samurai genre with in Kill Bill.
I had the privilege of screening this film a few days before its official release in a private after hours showing. Once the film had ended the first and pretty much only thing that came to mind was the extremely uneven ratio of talking to action. I rushed home to my laptop ready to vent to the world. I was more surprised than anyone that my idol had failed me, when truth be told he never actually did. As Bill would say... "I overreacted."
My original review can be found
here. As you can see I failed to mention the marvelous performances from a top notch cast. It is old news now that newcomer Christoph Waltz rightfully received the Best Supporting Actor Academy Award for his performance as Hans Landa. He does in fact steal the show with is combination of disarming likability, bursts of intelligence, and occasional ruthless intensity. Brad Pitt seems to be having a blast as the good 'ol boy Lt. Aldo Rien. A commander who insists his men go seriously savage on the enemy. The women here are also a force to be reckoned with as well. To me, Diane Kruger has never been that impressive of an actress in the past, but her role here as spy Bridget Von Hammersmark is classy, sexy, and sly. Melanie Laurent is stunning as well, playing the character of Shosanna, akin to a young Uma Thurman in pure revenge mode.
Originally the only chapter that I made reference to being any good the first time around was the second one. I should have noted how outstanding the cat and mouse opening truly is, as Landa interrogates a french dairy farmer by killing him with kindness, and he then proceeds to have Shoshanna's entire family slaughtered. It is an attention getter like no other, and masterfully sets the tone for the entire picture.
Other scenes have certainly grown on me as well. The mystery celebrity card game in the tavern basement between our heroes and the Gestapo Major is riveting. Watching these characters bluff as the tension builds is like watching them play two games, but only one of them is for fun, the other is a game of life and death. When it does culminate to a head the violence might be brief, but there is no denying that it is explosive. Definitely worth the wait. I also forgot to mention how much I loved the preparation scene for the premiere of Nation's Pride. The use of David Bowie's Cat People thumping over the soundtrack as characters prepare for battle amidst a red carpet opening is excellent. Scenes I only liked originally I have grown to love even more now. Scenes like the baseball bat interrogation and the disintegration of Hitler's face.
Do I still have problems with the film? Yes. I insist that for a film called Inglourious Basterds that they don't get nearly enough screen time. Hear me out. Not one single character appears in all five chapters. Landa (the supporting character) appears in the most with four. Pitt and his team are totally absent in two entire chapters, and when they are front and center half of the Jewish members stand in the background and say nothing. The German 'recruits' of the team get plenty of screen time (which I digress is totally necessary to the Operation Kino set-up), but why are actors like Sam Levine, Paul Rust, and BJ Novak even in this movie when they are given virtually nothing to do? Some of them don't even get a single line. Perhaps if the film had a different title I would have no cause for argument. Still, I have been able to overlook this.
Make no mistake this retraction is not a "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" thing. I truly do appreciate and enjoy this film now for what it is as opposed to what I wanted it to be. I actually found it interesting that while I couldn't find a single person who originally disliked it as much as I, there were several people who admitted to me that they wouldn't have enjoyed had I not told them what to expect with my original opinion. It might have been incorrect, but at least it seems it was still useful for something (I think).
In conclusion I would like to formally apologize to everyone I fought kicking and screaming with against this being a great film. Especially, my sister Emily. I don't think we have ever disagreed on a film more. In this case Emily you were right, and I was wrong. This is something I don't do too often so do not expect to see me back track other films I have either overly loved, or overly hated. Basterds is a special case. It is so unique that if any film deserved a second chance, this is it.
Now if you will excuse me, I must wash down this slice of humble pie with a tall glass of milk.